5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of nickel and nickel alloys is primarily intended to test material for compliance with specifications such as those under jurisdiction of ASTM committee B02. It may also be used to test compliance with other specifications that are compatible with the test method.5.2 It is assumed that all who use this method will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely, and that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.5.3 This is a performance-based method that relies more on the demonstrated quality of the test result than on strict adherence to specific procedural steps. It is expected that laboratories using this method will prepare their own work instructions. These work instructions will include detailed operating instructions for the specific laboratory, the specific reference materials employed, and performance acceptance criteria. It is also expected that, when applicable, each laboratory will participate in proficiency test programs, such as described in Practice E2027, and that the results from the participating laboratory will be satisfactory.1.1 This test method describes the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric analysis of nickel and nickel allys, as specified by Committee B02, and having chemical compositions within the following limits:Element Application Range (Mass Fraction %)Aluminum 0. 01–6.00Boron 0. 01–0.10Carbon 0. 01–0.15Chromium 0. 01–33.00Copper 0.01–35.00Cobalt 0. 01–20.00Iron 0.05–50.00Magnesium 0. 01–0.020Molybdenum 0. 01–30.0Niobium 0. 01–6.0Nickel 25.00–100.0Phosphorous 0.001–0.025Silicon 0.01–1.50Sulfur 0.0001–0.01Titanium 0.0001–6.0Tungsten 0.01–5.0Vanadium 0.0005–1.01.2 The following elements may be determined using this method.Element Quantification Range (μg/g)Antimony 0.5–50Bismuth 0.1–11Gallium 2.9–54Lead 0.4–21Silver 1–35Tin 2.2–97Thallium 0.5–3.01.3 This method has only been interlaboratory tested for the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend this method to other elements or different composition ranges provided that method validation that includes evaluation of method sensitivity, precision, and bias as described in this document is performed. Additionally, the validation study must evaluate the acceptability of sample preparation methodology using reference materials and/or spike recoveries. The user is cautioned to carefully evaluate the validation data as to the intended purpose of the analytical results. Guide E2857 provides additional guidance on method validation.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific safety hazard statements are given in Section 9.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

5.1 Moisture as determined by this test method is used for calculating other analytical results to a moisture free basis using procedures in Practice D3180. Moisture percent determined by this test method may be used in conjunction with the air-dry moisture loss determined in Method D2013 and Test Method D3302 to determine total moisture in coal. Total moisture is used for calculating other analytical results to “as received” basis using Practice D3180. Moisture, ash, volatile matter, and fixed carbon percents constitute the proximate analysis of coal and coke.1.1 This test method covers the determination of moisture in the analysis sample of coal or coke. It is used for calculating other analytical results to a dry basis. When used in conjunction with the air drying loss as determined in accordance with Method D2013 or Practice D346, each analytical result can be calculated to an as-received basis:1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 515元 / 折扣价： 438 元 加购物车

1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of solid acid copper chromate and solutions of this material. 1.1.1 Test Method D38 covers the sampling of wood preservatives prior to testing. 1.2 The analytical procedures appear in the following order: Sections Copper (calculated as CuO) 7 to 10 Hexavalent chromium (calculated as CrO ) 11 to 13 pH of solution 14 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

3.1 For custody transfer and other purposes, it is frequently necessary to convert a component analysis of light hydrocarbon mixture from one basis (either gas volume, liquid volume, or mass) to another.3.2 The component distribution data of light hydrocarbon mixtures can be used to calculate physical properties such as relative density, vapor-pressure, and calorific value. Consistent and accurate conversion data are extremely important when calculating vapor, liquid, or mass equivalence.1.1 This practice describes the procedure for the interconversion of the analysis of C5 and lighter hydrocarbon mixtures to gas-volume (mole), liquid-volume, or mass basis.1.2 The computation procedures described assume that gas-volume percentages have already been corrected for nonideality of the components as a part of the analytical process by which they have been obtained. These are numerically the same as mole percentages.1.3 The procedure assumes the absence of nonadditivity corrections for mixtures of the pure liquid compounds. This is approximately true only for mixtures of hydrocarbons of the same number of carbon atoms, and in the absence of diolefins and acetylenic compounds.1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

5.1 Ash, as determined by this test method, is the residue remaining after burning the coal and coke. Ash obtained differs in composition from the inorganic constituents present in the original coal. Incineration causes an expulsion of all water, the loss of carbon dioxide from carbonates, the conversion of iron pyrites into ferric oxide, and other chemical reactions. Ash, as determined by this test method, will differ in amount from ash produced in furnace operations and other firing systems because incineration conditions influence the chemistry and amount of the ash. References for correcting ash results determined by this test method to a mineral-matter-free basis are listed in Classification D388, Section 9.1.1 This test method covers the determination of the inorganic residue as ash in the analysis sample of coal or coke as prepared in accordance with Practice D2013 or Practice D346. The results obtained can be applied as the ash in the proximate analysis, Practice D3172, and in the ultimate analysis, Practice D3176. For the determination of the constituents in ash, reference is made to Test Methods D3682, D4326, and D6349. Test Methods D6357 should be used to prepare ash to be used for trace element analysis. See Terminology D121 for definition of ash.1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications, particularly those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committees A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel, and Related Alloys and A04 on Iron Castings. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of carbon steels, low-alloy steels, silicon electrical steels, ingot iron, and wrought iron having chemical compositions within the following limits:Element  Composition Range, %Aluminum 0.001  to 1.50Antimony 0.002  to 0.03Arsenic 0.0005 to 0.10Bismuth 0.005  to 0.50Boron 0.0005 to 0.02Calcium 0.0005 to 0.01Cerium 0.005  to 0.50Chromium 0.005  to 3.99Cobalt 0.01   to 0.30Columbium (Niobium) 0.002  to 0.20Copper 0.005  to 1.50Lanthanum 0.001  to 0.30Lead 0.001  to 0.50Manganese 0.01   to 2.50Molybdenum 0.002  to 1.50Nickel 0.005  to 5.00Nitrogen 0.0005 to 0.04Oxygen 0.0001 to 0.03Phosphorus 0.001  to 0.25Selenium 0.001  to 0.50Silicon 0.001  to 5.00Sulfur 0.001  to 0.60Tin 0.002  to 0.10Titanium 0.002  to 0.60Tungsten 0.005  to 0.10Vanadium 0.005  to 0.50Zirconium 0.005  to 0.151.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated as follows:  Sections   Aluminum, Total, by the 8-Quinolinol Gravimetric Method (0.20 % to 1.5 %) 124–131Aluminum, Total, by the 8-Quinolinol Spectrophotometric Method (0.003 % to 0.20 %) 76–86Aluminum, Total or Acid-Soluble, by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.005 % to 0.20 %) 308–317Antimony by the Brilliant Green Spectrophotometric Method (0.0002 % to 0.030 %) 142–151Bismuth by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.02 % to 0.25 %) 298–307Boron by the Distillation-Curcumin Spectrophotometric Method (0.0003 % to 0.006 %) 208–219Calcium by the Direct-Current Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry Method (0.0005 % to 0.010 %) 289–297Carbon, Total, by the Combustion Gravimetric Method (0.05 % to 1.80 %)—Discontinued 1995  Cerium and Lanthanum by the Direct Current Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry Method (0.003 % to 0.50 % Cerium, 0.001 % to 0.30 % Lanthanum) 249–257Chromium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.006 % to 1.00 %) 220–229Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate Oxidation-Titration Method (0.05 % to 3.99 %) 230–238Cobalt by the Nitroso-R Salt Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 0.30 %) 53–62Copper by the Sulfide Precipitation-Iodometric Titration Method (Discontinued 1989) 87–94Copper by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.004 % to 0.5 %) 279–288Copper by the Neocuproine Spectrophotometric Method (0.005 % to 1.50 %) 114–123Lead by the Ion-Exchange—Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.001 % to 0.50 %) 132–141Manganese by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.005 % to 2.0 %) 269–278Manganese by the Metaperiodate Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 2.5 %) 9–18Manganese by the Peroxydisulfate-Arsenite Titrimetric Method (0.10 % to 2.50 %) 164–171Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 1.50 %) 152–163Nickel by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.003 % to 0.5 %) 318–327Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime Gravimetric Method (0.1 % to 5.00 %) 180–187Nickel by the Ion-Exchange-Atomic-Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.005 % to 1.00 %) 188–197Nitrogen by the Distillation-Spectrophotometric Method (Discontinued 1988) 63–75Phosphorus by the Alkalimetric Method (0.02 % to 0.25 %) 172–179Phosphorus by the Molybdenum Blue Spectrophotometric Method (0.003 % to 0.09 %) 19–30Silicon by the Molybdenum Blue Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 0.06 %) 103–113Silicon by the Gravimetric Titration Method (0.05 % to 3.5 %) 46–52Sulfur by the Gravimetric Method (Discontinued 1988) 31–36Sulfur by the Combustion-Iodate Titration Method (0.005 % to 0.3 %) (Discontinued 2017) 37–45Tin by the Sulfide Precipitation-Iodometric Titration Method (0.01 % to 0.1 %) 95–102Tin by the Solvent Extraction-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.002 % to 0.10 %) 198–207Titanium by the Diantipyrylmethane Spectrophotometric Method (0.025 % to 0.30 %) 258–268Vanadium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.006 % to 0.15 %) 239–2481.3 Test methods for the determination of several elements not included in this standard can be found in Test Methods E1019.1.4 Some of the composition ranges given in 1.1 are too broad to be covered by a single test method and therefore this standard contains multiple test methods for some elements. The user must select the proper test method by matching the information given in the and Interference sections of each test method with the composition of the alloy to be analyzed.1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. In some cases, exceptions allowed in IEEE/ASTM SI 10 are also used.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazards statements are given in Section 6 and in special “Warning” paragraphs throughout these test methods.1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 983元 / 折扣价： 836 元 加购物车

AbstractThese test methods establish the apparatuses required, standard procedures, and associated calculations for determining the particle size distribution and shape grading of sand in golf course putting green and other sand-based sports field rootzone mixtures assumed to have sand contents of 80 % by weight or greater. Particles large enough to be retained on a No. 270 sieve are determined by sieving, while, the silt and clay percentages are determined by a sedimentation process using the pipet method.1.1 This test method covers the determination of particle size distribution of putting green and other sand-based rootzone mixes. Particles larger than 0.05 mm (retained on a No. 270 sieve) are determined by sieving. The silt and clay percentages are determined by a sedimentation process, using the pipet method. This procedure was developed for putting green rootzone mixes, those assumed to have sand contents of 80 % by weight or greater. Particle size analysis of soils may be performed by this test method or Test Method D422. This test method also describes a qualitative evaluation of sand particle shape.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 515元 / 折扣价： 438 元 加购物车

1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of solid chromated copper arsenate and solutions of this material. 1.1.1 Test Method D 38 covers the sampling of wood preservatives prior to testing. 1.2 The analytical procedures occur in the following order: Sections Pentavalent arsenic (calculated as As2O5) 7 to 9 Copper (calculated as CuO) 10 to 13 Hexavalent chromium (calculated as CrO3) 14 to 16 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in 8.2, 12.1.2, and in accordance with the safety precautions section of Test Method D4278.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

5.1 Volatile matter, when determined as herein described, can be used to establish the rank of coals, to indicate coke yield on carbonization process, to provide the basis for purchasing and selling, or to establish burning characteristics.1.1 This test method covers the determination of the gaseous products, exclusive of moisture vapor, as volatile matter in the analysis sample of coal or coke from coal.1.2 The test method for the determination of volatile matter is empirical.1.3 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 646元 / 折扣价： 550 元 加购物车

4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications, particularly those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A04 on Iron Castings. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of pig iron, gray cast iron (including alloy and austenitic), white cast iron, malleable cast iron, and ductile (nodular) iron having chemical compositions within the following limits:Element Composition Range, % Aluminum 0.003 to  0.50Antimony 0.005 to  0.03Arsenic 0.02  to  0.10Bismuth 0.001 to  0.03Boron 0.001 to  0.10Cadmium 0.001 to 0.005Carbon 1.25  to  4.50Cerium 0.005 to  0.05Chromium 0.01  to 30.00Cobalt 0.01  to  4.50Copper 0.03  to  7.50Lead 0.001 to  0.15Magnesium 0.002 to  0.10Manganese 0.06  to  2.50Molybdenum 0.01  to  5.00Nickel 0.01  to 36.00Phosphorus 0.01  to  0.90Selenium 0.001 to  0.06Silicon 0.10 to 6.0   Sulfur 0.005 to  0.25Tellurium 0.001 to  0.35Tin 0.001 to  0.35Titanium 0.001 to  0.20Tungsten 0.001 to  0.20Vanadium 0.005 to  0.50Zinc 0.005 to  0.201.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated below:  Sections Carbon, Graphitic, by the Direct Combustion Infrared Absorption Method (1 % to 3 %) 108–115Carbon, Total by the Combustion Gravimetric Method (1.25 % to 4.50 %)—Discontinued 2012  97–107Cerium and Lanthanum by the Direct Current Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry Method (Ce: 0.003 % to 0.5 %; La: 0.001 % to 0.30 %) 237–245Chromium by the Atomic Absorption Method (0.006 % to 1.00 %) 208–217Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate Oxidation—Titration Method (0.05 % to 30.0 %) 218–226Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate-Oxidation Titrimetric Method (0.05 % to 30.0 %)—Discontinued 1980 144–151Cobalt by the Ion-Exchange—Potentiometric Titration Method (2.0 % to 4.5 %)  53–60Cobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 4.50 %)  61–70Copper by the Neocuproine Spectrophotometric Method (0.03 % to 7.5 %) 116–125Copper by the Sulfide Precipitation-Electrodeposition Gravimetric Method (0.03 % to 7.5 %)  81–88Lead by the Ion-Exchange—Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.001 % to 0.15 %) 126–135Magnesium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.002 % to 0.10 %)  71–80Manganese by the Periodate Spectrophotometric Method (0.10 % to 2.00 %)   9–18Manganese by the Peroxydisulfate-Arsenite Titrimetric Method (0.10 % to 3.5 %) 152–159Molybdenum by the Ion Exchange–8-Hydroxyquinoline Gravimetric Method 257–264Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 1.5 %) 196–207Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime Gravimetric Method (0.1 % to 36.00 %) 168–175Nickel by the Ion Exchange-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.005 % to 1.00 %) 176–185Phosphorus by the Alkalimetric Method (0.02 % to 0.90 %) 160–167Phosphorus by the Molybdenum Blue Spectrophotometric Method (0.02 % to 0.90 %)  19–30Silicon by the Gravimetric Method (0.1 % to 6.0 %)  46–52Sulfur by the Gravimetric Method—Discontinued 1988  30–36Sulfur by the Combustion-Iodate Titration Method (0.005 % to 0.25 %)—Discontinued 2012  37–45Sulfur by the Chromatographic Gravimetric Method—Discontinued 1980 136–143Tin by the Solvent Extraction-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.002 % to 0.10 %)  186–195Tin by the Sulfide Precipitation-Iodometric Titration Method (0.01 % to 0.35 %)   89–96Titanium by the Diantipyrylmethane Spectrophotometric Method (0.006 % to 0.35 %)  246–256Vanadium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.006 % to 0.15 %)  227–2361.3 Procedures for the determination of carbon and sulfur not included in these test methods can be found in Test Methods E1019.1.4 Some of the composition ranges given in 1.1 are too broad to be covered by a single method and therefore this standard contains multiple methods for some elements. The user must select the proper method by matching the information given in the and Interference sections of each method with the composition of the alloy to be analyzed.1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazards statements are given in Section 6 and in special “Warning” paragraphs throughout these Methods.1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 918元 / 折扣价： 781 元 加购物车

4.1 Summarizing the ash content and the content of the organic constituents in a specific format under the heading, Ultimate Analysis, provides a convenient and uniform system for comparing coals or cokes. This tabulation used with that of Proximate Analysis (Practice D3172) permits cursory valuation of coals for use as fuel or in other carbonaceous processes and of cokes for metallurgical purpose.1.1 This practice covers the term ultimate analysis as it is applied to the analysis of coal and coke. The information derived is intended for the general utilization by applicable industries, to provide the basis for evaluation, beneficiation, or for other purposes.1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.2.1 All percentages are percent mass fractions.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 515元 / 折扣价： 438 元 加购物车

5.1 This standard is intended for use by researchers and designers to assess the stability of articulating concrete block (ACB) revetment systems in order to achieve stable hydraulic performance under the erosive force of flowing water.5.2 An articulating concrete block system is comprised of a matrix of individual concrete blocks placed together to form an erosion-resistant revetment with specific hydraulic performance characteristics. The system includes a filter layer compatible with the subsoil which allows infiltration and exfiltration to occur while providing particle retention. The filter layer may be comprised of a geotextile, properly graded granular media, or both. The blocks within the matrix shall be dense and durable, and the matrix shall be flexible and porous.5.3 Articulating concrete block systems are used to provide erosion protection to underlying soil materials from the forces of flowing water. The term “articulating,” as used in this standard, implies the ability of individual blocks of the system to conform to changes in the subgrade while remaining interconnected by virtue of block interlock or additional system components such as cables, ropes, geotextiles, geogrids, or other connecting devices, or combinations thereof.5.4 The definition of articulating concrete block systems does not distinguish between interlocking and non-interlocking block geometries, between cable-tied and non-cable-tied systems, between vegetated and non-vegetated systems or between methods of manufacturing or placement. This standard does not specify size restrictions for individual block units. Block systems are available in either open-cell or closed-cell varieties.1.1 The purpose of this guide is to provide recommended guidelines for the analysis and interpretation of hydraulic test data for articulating concrete block (ACB) revetment systems under steep slope, high velocity flow conditions in a rectangular open channel. Data from tests performed under controlled laboratory conditions are used to quantify stability performance of ACB systems under hydraulic loading. This guide is intended to be used in conjunction with Test Method D7277.1.2 This guide offers an organized collection of information or a series of options and does not recommend a specific course of action. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this guide may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor can this document be applied without considerations of a project’s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The user of the standard is responsible for any and all conversions to other systems of units. Reporting of test results in units other than inch-pound shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this test method.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

3.1 These test methods provide for the classification of various grades of sulfuric acid and for the determination of various impurities. Acid strength and impurity levels are important factors in many uses of sulfuric acid.1.1 These test methods cover the analysis of sulfuric acid.1.2 The following applies for the purposes of determining the conformance of the test results using this test method to applicable specifications, results shall be rounded off in accordance with the rounding-off method of Practice E29.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.1.4 The analytical procedures appear in the following order:  SectionsTotal Acidity  8 to 16Baumé Gravity 17 to 26Nonvolatile Matter 27 to 33Iron 34 to 43Sulfur Dioxide 44 to 51Arsenic 52 to 611.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Consult current OSHA regulations, suppliers’ Safety Data Sheets, and local regulations for all materials used in this specification. Specific hazards statements are given in Section 5.1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 646元 / 折扣价： 550 元 加购物车

4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications particularly those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel, and Related Alloys. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of tool steels and other similar medium- and high-alloy steels having chemical compositions within the following limits:Element Composition Range, %Aluminum   0.005 to 1.5Boron   0.001 to 0.10Carbon   0.03  to 2.50Chromium   0.10  to 14.0Cobalt   0.10  to 14.0Copper   0.01  to 2.0Lead   0.001 to 0.01Manganese   0.10  to 15.00Molybdenum   0.01  to 10.00Nickel   0.02  to 4.00Nitrogen   0.001 to 0.20Phosphorus   0.002 to 0.05Silicon   0.10  to 2.50Sulfur   0.002 to 0.40Tungsten   0.01  to 21.00Vanadium   0.02  to 5.501.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated below:    SectionsCarbon, Total, by the Combustion— Thermal Conductivity Method— Discontinued 1986   125–135Carbon, Total, by the Combustion Gravimetric Method—Discontinued 2012   78–88Chromium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.006 % to 1.00 %) 174–183Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate Oxidation—Titration Method   (0.10 % to 14.00 %) 184–192Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate-Oxidation Titrimetric Method—Discontinued 1980   117–124Cobalt by the Ion-Exchange— Potentiometric Titration Method     (2 % to 14 %)  52–59Cobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt  Spectrophotometric Method  (0.10 % to 5.0 %)  60–69Copper by the Neocuproine  Spectrophotometric Method  (0.01 % to 2.00 %) 89–98Copper by the Sulfide Precipitation- Electrodeposition Gravimetric Method   (0.01 % to 2.0 %)  70–77Lead by the Ion-Exchange—Atomic  Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.001 % to 0.01 %) 99–108Manganese by the Periodate  Spectrophotometric Method  (0.10 % to 5.00 %) 9–18Molybdenum by the Ion Exchange– 8-Hydroxyquinoline Gravimetric Method    203–210Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric Method  (0.01 % to 1.50 %) 162–173Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime Gravimetric Method (0.1 % to 4.0 %) 144–151Phosphorus by the Alkalimetric Method  (0.01 % to 0.05 %) 136–143Phosphorus by the Molybdenum Blue  Spectrophotometric Method (0.002 % to 0.05 %) 19–29Silicon by the Gravimetric Method  (0.10 % to 2.50 %) 45–51Sulfur by the Gravimetric Method—Discontinued 1988   29–35Sulfur by the Combustion-Iodate  Titration Method—Discontinued 2012   36–44Sulfur by the Chromatographic Gravimetric Method—Discontinued 1980   109–116Tin by the Solvent Extraction— Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.002 % to 0.10 %) 152–161Vanadium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.006 % to 0.15 %) 193–2021.3 Test methods for the determination of carbon and sulfur not included in this standard can be found in Test Methods E1019.1.4 Some of the composition ranges given in 1.1 are too broad to be covered by a single test method and therefore this standard contains multiple test methods for some elements. The user must select the proper test method by matching the information given in the and Interference sections of each test method with the composition of the alloy to be analyzed.1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazards statements are given in Section 6 and in special “Warning” paragraphs throughout these test methods.1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 843元 / 折扣价： 717 元 加购物车

Determination of sulfur is, by definition, part of the ultimate analysis of coal.Sulfur analysis results obtained by these methods are used to serve a number of interests: evaluation of coal preparation, evaluation of potential sulfur emissions from coal combustion or conversion processes, evaluation of the coal quality in relation to contract specification, and other purposes of commercial or scientific interest.1.1 These test methods cover two alternative procedures for the determination of total sulfur in samples of coal and coke. Sulfur is included in the ultimate analysis of coal and coke.1.2 The procedures appear in the following order: SectionsMethod A—Eschka Method 6-9Method B—Bomb Washing Method 10 and 111.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in Sections 11.1.1-11.1.1.7.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元