4.1 This practice is for use by designers and specifiers, regulatory agencies, owners, and inspection organizations who are involved in the rehabilitation of sewer service laterals and its connection to the main through the use of a resin-impregnated tube installed within an existing sewer lateral. As for any practice, modifications may be required for specific job conditions.1.1 This practice covers requirements and test methods for the reconstruction of a sewer service lateral pipe having an inner diameter of 3 to 12 in. (7.6 to 30.5 cm) and its connection to the main pipe having an inner diameter of 6 to 24 in. (15.2 to 61.0 cm) and up the lateral a maximum of 150 ft (46 m) without excavation. The lateral pipe is accessed remotely from the main pipe and from a lateral access point. This will be accomplished by the installation of a resin impregnated one-piece main and lateral cured-in-place lining (MLCIPL) by means of air inflation and inversion. The MLCIPL is pressed against the host pipe by pressurizing a bladder and is held in place until the thermoset resins have cured. When cured, the MLCIPL shall be a continuous, one piece, tight fitting, corrosion resistant lining extending over a predetermined length of the lateral pipe and the adjacent section of the main pipe, providing a verifiable non-leaking structural connection and seal.1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.3 There is no similar or equivalent ISO Standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

5.1 This practice provides a general procedure for the solid phase micro extraction of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds from an aqueous matrix or its headspace. Solid sorbent extraction is used as the initial step in the extraction of organic constituents for the purpose of quantifying or screening for extractable organic compounds.5.2 Typical detection limits that can be achieved using SPME techniques with gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (FID), electron capture detector (ECD), or with a mass spectrometer (MS) range from mg/L to μg/L. The detection limit, linear concentration range, and sensitivity of the test method for a specific organic compound will depend upon the aqueous matrix, the fiber phase, the sample temperature, sample volume, sample mixing, and the determinative technique employed.5.3 SPME has the advantages of speed, no desorption solvent, simple extraction device, and the use of small amounts of sample.5.3.1 Extraction devices vary from a manual SPME fiber holder to automated commercial device specifically designed for SPME.5.3.2 Listed below are examples of organic compounds that can be determined by this practice. This list includes both high and low boiling compounds.Volatile Organic Compounds (1-3)3Pesticides, General (4, 5)Organochlorine Pesticides (6)Organophosphorous Pesticides (7, 8)Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (9, 10)Polychlorinated Biphenyls (10)Phenols (11)Nitrophenols (12)Amines (13)5.3.3 SPME may be used to screen water samples prior to purge and trap extraction to determine if dilution is necessary, thereby eliminating the possibility of trap overload.1.1 This practice covers procedures for the extraction of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds from water and its headspace using solid phase micro extraction (SPME).1.2 The compounds of interest must have a greater affinity for the SPME-absorbent polymer or adsorbent or combinations of these than the water or headspace phase in which they reside.1.3 Not all of the analytes that can be determined by SPME are addressed in this practice. The applicability of the absorbent polymer, adsorbent, or combination thereof, to extract the compound(s) of interest must be demonstrated before use.1.4 This practice provides sample extracts suitable for quantitative or qualitative analysis by gas chromatography (GC) or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).1.5 Where used, it is the responsibility of the user to validate the application of SPME to the analysis of interest.1.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statements, see Section 12.1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

1.1 This standard is a compilation of terminology developed by Committee D13.18 on Glass Fiber and its Products.1.2 This terminology is unique to glass fibers, strands, yarns, fabrics, etc. in the glass textile industry. Terms that are generally understood or adequately defined in other readily available sources are not included.1.3 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.1.4 Subcommittee D13.18 has jurisdictional responsibility for standards and terminology in this standard. Any change in wording requires the approval of D13.18 subcommittee. Any changes approved by the subcommittee and main committee are then directed to subcommittee D13.92 on Terminology for inclusion in Terminology D123.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

5.1 Type 1 latex allergy most commonly manifests as localized urticaria after contact of skin with natural rubber but can also include symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma and rarely anaphylaxis. This immediate (Type I) allergy is caused by HNRL proteins inherent to the rubber tree, which remain on the finished products. The quantification of protein levels in HNRL products using the standard colorimetric protein assays may give spurious results due to chemical additives in the latex formulations that interfere with the assay (2,3). Furthermore, the amount of protein found in HNRL products are often below the detection limits of the standard colorimetric protein assay (4,5).5.2 This test method describes an immunological method for quantitation of HNRL proteins using rabbit anti-HNRL serum. Rabbits immunized with HNRL proteins react to the majority of the proteins present, and their sera have the capability to detect most if not all of the proteins in HNRL. Therefore, although rabbit antibody reacts with antigenic material, this should not be considered as quantitative measure of total protein levels.1.1 This test method covers an immunological method to determine the amount of antigenic protein in Hevea Natural Rubber and its products using rabbit antisera specific for HNRL proteins. This immunoassay procedure quantitatively measures the level of antigenic latex proteins in solution using an inhibition format. The samples may include glove or other product extracts which have been collected in order to measure the HNR levels. Although this method detects antigenic proteins, it should not be considered as a measure of allergenic proteins. Correlation of protein/antigen levels with the level of allergenic proteins has not been fully established.1.2 For the purpose of this test method, the range of protein will be measured in terms of microgram to milligram quantities.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 590元 / 折扣价： 502 元 加购物车

4.1 The purpose of this practice is to bring about uniformity of commercial moisture standards in all ASTM specifications relating to wool and its products.4.2 This practice provides a recommended single value for a standardized commercial moisture content for wool and its products. This avoids difficulties encountered in calculating the amount of moisture-free fiber present in a given mass of wool in any one of the forms listed in 1.1.1 to 1.1.8 due to trade practices which recognize various commercial moisture allowance values used by certain segments of the trade. (See Test Method D584, Section 3.5, Table D1909,D1909 Note E, and the Tables in Practice D2720).4.3 The recommended commercial moisture content should be used where it is desirable to avoid problems in determining moisture-free fiber content when the form of the wool is changed. For example: from scoured wool (12.0 % moisture content) to worsted yarn, dry spun (13.04 % moisture content).1.1 This practice recommends that a single value be adopted for the commercial moisture content of wool in any of the following forms:1.1.1 Scoured,1.1.2 Carbonized and neutralized,1.1.3 Noils, uncarbonized,1.1.4 Top, oil or dry combed,1.1.5 Yarn, worsted,1.1.6 Yarn, woolen,1.1.7 Yarn, hand knitting, or1.1.8 Fabric.1.2 Limitations—Grease wool, pulled wool, and wool with pH below 5.0 are excluded from this practice.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 515元 / 折扣价： 438 元 加购物车

5.1 This test method is used to determine the sonic velocity and approximate Young's modulus of refractory shapes at room temperature. Since this test is nondestructive, specimens may be used for other tests as desired.5.2 This test method is useful for research and development, engineering application and design, manufacturing quality and process control, and for developing purchasing specifications.1.1 This test method describes a procedure for measuring the sonic velocity in refractory materials at room temperature. The sonic velocity can be used to obtain an approximate value for Young's modulus.1.2 The sonic velocity may be measured through the length, thickness, and width of the specimen.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 515元 / 折扣价： 438 元 加购物车

This guide is intended for use in a biotechnology laboratory when the need arises to identify a preparation containing M13 bacteriophage or DNA.1.1 This guide covers the identification of bacteriophage M13 used in biotechnology.1.2 There are many variants of M13 that have been developed specifically for cloning technology. These variants have foreign DNA inserted into the M13 genome, causing the M13 to differ in size and genotype.1.3 If the M13 is to be used to construct a recombinant molecule, then the criteria described in Section 6 should be used to characterize the newly made DNA.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

This specification deals with archiving intelligent transportation system-generated traffic monitoring data, including conventional traffic monitoring data, collected data directly from intelligent transportation systems, and travel-time data from probe vehicles. It is intended for primary use by archived data management system developers and administrators. It also can be used by traffic operations and planning stakeholders who need to understand the contents of the archived data management system. Archived data management system can support the following transportation agency functions: incident management support, disseminate traveler information, performance measure support, intelligent transportation system program planning, traffic-monitoring program, corridor planning, evacuation and detour planning, safety planning support, operations planning, and travel demand forecasting and simulation support. The application requirements of stakeholder group are specified for input data, traffic monitoring data, temporal resolution, and spatial resolution. Archived data dictionary and input and processing procedures for archived data management system shall be developed. Quality control checks for validity shall be applied to the original source data, statistics, and aggregated data. All data quality attributes specified in this section shall be reported in the metadata on an annual basis. The metadata shall maintain a complete history of the annual reporting of data quality attributes. Tests for data accuracy shall be done with the following parameters: location, date, equipment, time tested, description of the method, and number of comparisons made. The completeness report shall be specified and updated at least annually.1.1 This specification describes data elements and schema for an archived data management system for intelligent transportation system (ITS)-generated traffic monitoring data, including conventional traffic monitoring data, data collected directly from ITS systems, and travel-time data from probe vehicles. It establishes the names of the data elements, their interrelationships, and their procedural definitions. These procedural definitions include data collection instrumentation and methodology as well as recommended procedures for calculating traffic statistics.1.2 This specification is intended for primary use by archived data management system (ADMS) developers and administrators. It also can be used by traffic operations and planning stakeholders who need to understand the contents of the ADMS. ITS systems exist across a variety of governmental levels, and the data archived in such a system would be available to all levels of government and the private sector, making this specification applicable to all levels of government and the private sector.1.3 Many users might wish to develop integrated archived traffic data management systems that include both ITS-generated data and data collected from conventional traffic-monitoring programs. The latter use requires a superset of data elements to meet the articulated nature of a conventional traffic-monitoring program. This specification will describe a basic set of data elements applicable to ITS-generated traffic data and the additional data elements required for conventional traffic-monitoring programs. In the following discussion, the specification for the system for ITS-generated data will be referred to as the “basic system,” and the one for ITS plus conventional traffic-monitoring data will be denoted the “extended system.” Travel-time data from probe vehicles are stored in separate tables that can be linked through the roadway link identifiers.1.4 This specification is applicable to traffic data collected by ITS and stored in an ADMS. Similarly, this specification also can be used with other types of historical and monitored traffic data collected and stored in an ADMS, including travel-time data from probe vehicles.1.5 The applications of “near-real-time” traffic data, such as an automated transit information system (ATIS), are not addressed in this specification. In many cases, traffic data to be archived will be provided by a real-time system, but these systems are considered data sources rather than data repositories.1.6 This specification specifies a logical data structure for an archived traffic data management system.1.7 Metadata requirements are specified for these systems. Actual metadata are provided for the elements defined in this specification. Placeholders are included for the metadata elements that are specific to a given installation. All metadata specifications follow the requirements of Practice E2468.1.8 This specification assumes the existence of quality-checked data. The quality checks to be applied should be, at a minimum, those specified in the AASHTO Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs (1),2 where applicable. As quality checks are developed for ITS-generated traffic data, they should be used. All checks used should be specified in the metadata for the archive.1.9 The summary statistics stored in the archive are assumed to have been calculated in a standard way by the software that “feeds” the archive. These standard calculations should be those specified in the AASHTO Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs (1). Any exceptions to these computational methods should be defined in the metadata for the archive.1.10 This specification assumes the existence of a road network database but does not specify the nature of this database. Both traffic and travel-time measurements occur on a road network, but the specification of that network is outside the scope of this specification. The entities defined in this specification will specify a “link location” or “link description” entity that will contain foreign keys to an unspecified road network entity.1.11 This specification assumes the existence of a location-referencing system and does not specify a standard for location referencing.1.12 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.13 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

定价： 1189元 / 折扣价： 1011 元 加购物车

The use of sound speed values to determine changes in the elastic constants due to applied or residual stress requires that such measurements be of high precision and low bias. For that reason, special evaluation tests to determine a representative precision and bias for the specific technique, method, and equipment setup used are given. Speed of sound is a measure that depends on the accurate measurements of length of path of travel and transit time or other related parameters such as frequency, etc. Both measurements are subject to certain interpretations and assumptions and are highly dependent on laboratory expertise. This practice provides a means of checking overall technique. This practice shall be used when it is necessary to assess the systematic and random errors associated with a particular speed of sound measurement in a solid medium. It can be used to check both equipment performance and measurement technique for these errors. It can also be used to study inherent errors in a particular method. It can also be used to assess proposed corrections to sound speed measurements such as the phase corrections of Papadakis (3, 4). The resultant precision and bias determined by the use of the described block represents a more ideal situation than the same measurement performed in practice, in the field. Thus, the error for the specific field measurement may be larger than indicated by this test. This test represents the best error condition for a given technique and practice. 1.1 This practice provides a means for evaluating both systematic and random errors for ultrasonic speed-of-sound measurement systems which are used for evaluating material characteristics associated with residual stress and which may also be used for nondestructive measurements of the dynamic elastic moduli of materials. Important features and construction details of a reference block crucial to these error evaluations are described. This practice can be used whenever the precision and bias of sound speed values are in question.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

The purpose of this test method is to provide a means of designating the size classification of RDF-3 for use by consumers and producers of RDF-3.1.1 This test method of designating the size of refuse-derived fuel from its sieve analysis is applicable to the classified light fraction (RDF-3) of shredded municipal or industrial waste materials less than 0.15 m (6 in.) in size.1.2 The values stated in acceptable metric units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For more specific precautionary information see Section 7.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

This guide will evaluate sample data that contain a high level of uncertainty for decision-making purposes and, where it is feasible, design a statistical study to estimate and reduce the sources of uncertainty. Oftentimes, historical data may be available and adequate for this purpose and no new study is needed.3.1.1 This approach will help the stakeholders better understand where the greatest sources of uncertainty are in the sampling and analysis process. Resources can be directed to where they can most reduce the overall uncertainty.3.1.2 Sampling and analysis design under this approach can often be cost-efficient because (a) the reduction in uncertainty can be done by statistical means alone and (b) the reduction can be translated into a lower number of analyses.This guide is limited to the situation where a decision is based on the mean of a population. It will only include discussions of a balanced design for the collection and analysis of sample data in order to estimate the sources of uncertainty. References to unbalanced designs are provided where appropriate.1.1 Waste management decisions generally involve uncertainty because of the fact that decisions are based on the use of sample data. When uncertainty can be reduced or controlled, a better decision can be achieved. One way to reduce or control uncertainty is through the estimation and control of the components contributing to the overall uncertainty (or variance). Control of the sizes of these variance components is an optimization process. The optimizations results can be used to either improve an existing sampling and analysis plan (if it should be found to be inadequate for decision-making purposes) or to optimize a new plan by directing resources to where the overall variance can be reduced the most.1.2 Estimation of the variance components from the total variance starts with the sampling and measurement process. The process involves two different kinds of uncertainties: random and systematic. The former is associated with imprecision of the data, while the latter is associated with bias of the data. This guide will discuss only sources of uncertainty of a random nature.1.3 There may be many sources of uncertainty in waste management decisions. However, this guide does not intend to address the issue of how these sources are identified. It is the responsibility of the stakeholders and their technical staff to analyze the sampling and measurement processes in order to identify the potentially significant sources of uncertainty. After identifying these sources, this guide will provide guidance on how to collect and analyze data to obtain an estimate of the total uncertainty and its components.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

5.1 IgE-mediated allergic reactions to protein allergens in Hevea natural rubber latex derived from the Hevea brasiliensis tree emerged in the 1990s as a concern with occasional allergic manifestations. Symptoms encompassing hives, uriticaria, rhinitis, asthma and anaphylaxis have all been reported in latex allergic individuals exposed to products derived from Hevea natural rubber latex.5.2 Since no safe level of Hevea latex allergen exposure is known, avoidance is the primary mode of treating latex allergy.5.3 As a result of investigations conducted by many scientists across the world, fourteen latex allergens have so far been identified and categorized by the Allergen Nomenclature Sub-Committee of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) as Hev b 1 to Hev b 13 (Table 1) (see Specification D1193). Reported sensitization rates for these allergenic Hev b proteins vary among the many reports as a result of differences in the study populations, IgE antibody assay methods and the quality of the Hev b allergens used as calibrators and quality control reagents in the analysis. Most studies, however, agree that Hev b 1 and Hev b 3 are important allergens for individuals (for example, children with spina bifida) who are exposed through mucosal contact as a result of multiple surgeries or latex catheter use for an extended period of time. Additionally, investigators performing sensitization studies also agree that Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.02 are important allergens that may elicit sensitization in genetically-predisposed individuals who are exposed to Hevea natural rubber latex (2-4). On the basis of these clinical studies, assays for these four allergenic proteins (that is, Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.02) have been developed and they are thus the subject of this standard. Adoption of immunoenzymetric assay reagents and standard proteins needed to quantify other latex allergens (other than Hev b 1, 3, 5, and 6.02) in extracts of Hevea natural rubber latex products will require separate documentation and validation.(A) PR = pathogenesis-related.5.3.1 From the historical context, a number of assays have been developed to quantify the level of protein, antigen and allergen in Hevea natural rubber latex containing products (see Practices D4483 and D4678).5.3.2 The modified Lowry assay for total protein, Test Method D5712, was the first assay of this type. It assesses the level of total protein as an indirect indicator of allergenicity of latex-containing products. This assay does not discriminate between the allergenic and non-allergenic proteins.5.3.3 The second assay to be developed involved the use of human latex-specific IgE antibody in a competitive inhibition immunoassay format to estimate the overall allergenic potency of a Hevea natural rubber product extract (5, 6). The extract is incubated with human serum containing latex-specific IgE antibody and then this mixture is incubated with a solid phase latex allergosorbent. Latex allergenic proteins, if they are present, bind to the latex-specific IgE antibody in solution and they thus inhibit IgE antibody binding onto the latex allergosorbent. Allergosorbent bound IgE is then quantified and the extent of competitive inhibition of IgE binding is a measure of latex allergens. While this assay provides an estimate of the allergenicity or level of Hevea natural rubber allergens extractable from a product, difficulty in procuring reproducible lots of latex specific IgE containing human serum has precluded widespread use of this assay. For this reason, this assay has not been put forth as an ASTM standard.5.3.4 A third assay design is similar to the human IgE based competitive inhibition immunoassay, but it employs rabbit antiserum instead of human serum containing IgE anti-latex. The competitive inhibition enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been adopted as Test Method D6499. It measures latex proteins that elicit immune responses, but it cannot distinguish between latex allergens (IgE inducing) from non-allergenic antigens (non-IgE inducing).5.3.5 The most recent assay, which is the subject of this standard, is the two-site immunoenzymetric assay (IEMA) which uses an insolubilized capture antibody to bind one of Hev b allergenic proteins from a latex product extract, and a second enzyme labeled detection antibody to detect bound allergens. Optical density responses are interpolated from reference curves constructed with known allergens. The performance characteristics of the reagents used in immunoenzymetric assays for Hev b 1, 3, 5 and 6.02 were investigated in the international collaborative study associated with the development of this standard and results are provided in Sections 15 through 17.1.1 This test method covers an immunological method known as an immunoenzymetric assay to quantify the amount of 4 principal Hevea brasiliensis [Hev b] allergenic proteins [Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.02] in Hevea natural rubber and its products2 derived from latex using monoclonal antibodies specific for epitopes on these proteins. Since these assays quantify the levels of only 4 of the known 14 officially acknowledged allergens potentially present in Hevea natural rubber latex containing products, the sum of the four allergen levels shall be viewed as an indicator of the allergen burden and not as a measure of the total allergen content that can be released from the product.1.2 For the purpose of this test method, the range of allergenic protein will be measured in terms of nanogram to microgram quantities per gram or unit surface area of a Hevea natural rubber containing product.1.3 The test method is not designed to evaluate the potential of Hevea natural rubber containing materials to induce or elicit Type I (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity reactions.1.4 This test method should be used under controlled laboratory conditions to detect and quantify the level of 4 allergenic proteins found in Hevea natural rubber containing products. It should not be used to describe, appraise or assess the hazard or risk of these Hevea natural rubber containing materials or products under actual in use conditions.1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

1.1 This test method covers the determination of the total trace nitrogen (organic and inorganic) naturally found in liquid aromatic hydrocarbons, its derivatives and related chemicals.1.2 This test method is applicable for samples containing nitrogen from 0.05 to 100 mgN/kg. For higher concentrations refer to Test Method D 4629.1.3 The detector response for the technique within the scope of this test method is linear with nitrogen concentration.1.4 The following applies to all specified limits in this test method: for purposes of determining conformance with this test method, an observed value or a calculated value shall be rounded off "to the nearest unit" in the last right-hand digit used in expressing the specification limit, in accordance with the rounding-off method of Practice E 29.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statements, see Section 9 and Note 2, Note 3, Note 4, and Note 8.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元

5.1 This technique involves a chemical-precipitation reaction between the phencyclidine or its analogues and the precipitating reagent. The habit and the aggregation of the crystals formed could be used to distinguish phencyclidine or its analogues from other drugs.5.2 This technique can be utilized on phencyclidine or its analogues present in either the salt or free base form.5.3 This technique does not distinguish between salt and free base forms.1.1 This practice describes procedures applicable to the analysis of phencyclidine and its analogues using microcrystal tests (1-8).21.2 These procedures are applicable to phencyclidine and its analogues which are present in solid form or in a liquid form. They are not typically applicable to the analysis of phencyclidine and its analogues in biological samples.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.4 These procedures could generate observations indicating a positive test for phencyclidine and its analogues which could be incorporated into the analytical scheme as defined by the laboratory.1.5 This standard cannot replace knowledge, skills, or abilities acquired through appropriate education, training, and experience (see Practice E2326) and is to be used in conjunction with sound professional judgment by individuals with such discipline-specific knowledge, skills, and abilities.1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

定价： 515元 / 折扣价： 438 元 加购物车

This guide covers laboratory characterization procedures for identifying bacteriophage lambda or its DNA and assumes that the reader has basic knowledge in virology and molecular biology. Bacteriohage lambda is a temperate bacteriophage with an icosahedral hear and a single, non-contractile tail ending in a single tail fiber. The lambda genome consists of a single molecule of linear double-stranded DNA and has cohesive ends. The naturally preferred hosts is Escherichia coli K12. Hundreds of lambda variants derived from wild type lambda can be used in biotechnology and differ in genome size and genotype. These are used primarily as DNA vectors for cloning DNA fragments. Judging uncontaminated, pure lambda should be done through restriction enzyme analysis DNA characterization and the presence and identification of lambda DNA is accomplished by polymerase chain reaction. The primers used for detection of bacteriophage lambda should be chosen based on the reason for detection.1.1 This guide covers the procedures for identifying bacteriophage lambda used in biotechnology.1.2 There are hundreds of lambda variants that can be used for biotechnology. These lambda variants are derived from wild type lambda and differ in genome size and genotype.1.3 If the bacteriophage lambda is to be used to construct a recombinant molecule, then the same criteria as prescribed in Section 5 should be used to characterize the newly made DNA.

定价： 0元 / 折扣价： 0 元