ISO/IEC TR 11580:2007 defines a format for describing user interface objects, actions and attributes. It provides a basis for standardizing the names and properties of user interface objects, actions and attributes across multiple applications and platforms.ISO/IEC TR 11580:2007 contains guidance both on the standardization of user interface objects, actions and attributes and on the implementation of these objects, actions and attributes in any or all modalities. It is primarily intended for developers of standards, style guides and architectures involving user interface objects, actions and attributes. ISO/IEC TR 11580:2007 also provides software developers with a range of functionalities to be considered in the design of objects, actions and attributes within user interfaces.
Associated with the provision and operation of a Trusted Third Party (TTP) are a number of security-related issues for which general guidance is necessary to assist business entities, developers and providers of systems and services, etc. This includes guidance on issues regarding the roles, positions and relationships of TTPs and the entities using TTP services, the generic security requirements, who should provide what type of security, what the possible security solutions are, and the operational use and management of TTP service security.
The purpose of this Technical Report is to provide a general framework for discussing characters and glyphs. The framework is applicable to a variety of coded character sets and glyph-identification schemes. For illustration, this Technical Report uses ex-amples from characters coded in ISO/IEC 10646 and glyphs registered according to ISO/IEC 10036.This Technical Report?differentiates between coded characters and registered glyphs ?identifies the domain of use of coded characters and glyph identifiers ?provides a conceptual framework for the formatting and presentation of coded character data using glyph identifiers and glyph representationsThis Technical Report describes idealized principles that were not completely followed in coding characters for ISO/IEC 10646 and in registering glyphs according to ISO/IEC 10036. The fact that ISO/IEC 10646, ISO/IEC 10036, and other standards do not completely follow the principles in the model does not invalidate the model and does not diminish the utility of having the model.
ISO/IEC TR15446:2009 provides guidance relating to the construction of Protection Profiles (PPs) and Security Targets (STs) that are intended to be compliant with the third edition of ISO/IEC 15408. It is also applicable to PPs and STs compliant with Common Criteria Version 3.1, a technically identical standard published by the Common Criteria Management Board, a consortium of governmental organizations involved in IT security evaluation and certification.
Different users of information technology products possess different sets of abilities. Some abilities may not ever be present in a user as they may have been born without them. Some abilities are acquired, developed or deteriorate over time due to education, maturity, injury, illness or age. Just as it is possible that a user possesses a combination of abilities, it is also possible that they may lack a combination of abilities.ISO/IEC TR 19765:2007 presents icons and symbols currently used to provide access to facilities and tools to support the needs of elderly and disabled users of information technology (IT) products, and could form the basis of a future International Standard which would provide a recommended collection of icons and symbols.These icons and symbols have been collected from a variety of sources including other standards, contemporary software products, web sites and hardware devices. These sources are cross-referenced and listed in a bibliography.The icons and symbols presented in ISO/IEC TR 19765:2007 are categorized by modality and method of use.
ISO/IEC TR 24722:2007 provides a description of and analysis of current practice on multimodal and other multibiometric fusion, including (as appropriate) reference to a more detailed description. It also discusses the need for, and possible routes to, standardization to support multibiometric systems.
This Technical Report will discuss?concepts and considerations for the use of biometrics in a commercial Identity Management Solutions,?items that need to be considered when integrating biometrics into a commercial Identity Management Solutions, and?implementation Issues when implementing biometrics into commercial Identity Management Solutions.This Technical Report will not?define an architecture and framework for IDM,?discuss any specification or assessment of government policy,?discuss the business need for a biometric database or process,?discuss the specific biometrics and which ones are to be used in particular systems,?consider the legality and acceptability in particular jurisdictions and cultures,?analyse the general structure of identifiers and the global identification of objects (e.g. objectidentifiers), and?discuss technical specifications in relation to the use of trusted biometric hardware and software.
This Technical Report provides general guidance on the manner on which data can be expressed by codes. Describes the objectives of coding, the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of different coding methods, the features of codes and gives guidelines for the design of codes. Examples of applications are ISO 9735:1988, ISO 8601:1988, ISO 3166:1993.
In biometric performance testing and reporting, careful consideration needs to be given to the characteristic differences of each modality (fingerprint, face, iris, etc.). These differences naturally require variations within the general methodology defined in ISO/IEC 19795-1. ISO/IEC TR 19795-3:2007 describes the methodologies relating to these modality-dependent variations. It presents and defines methods for determining, given a specific biometric modality, how to develop a technical performance test.
The purpose of this technical report is to describe a set of procedures for the consistent registration of value domains and their attributes in a registry. This technical report is not a data entry manual, but a user's guide for conceptualizing a value domain and its components for the purpose of consistently establishing good quality metadata. An organization may adapt and/or add to these procedures as necessary.
This Technical Report gives mechanisms for formally specifying the syntax of XML-based languages. For example, the syntax of XHTML 1.0 can be specified in RELAX.Compared with DTDs, RELAX provides the following advantages:?Specification in RELAX uses XML instance (i.e., document) syntax, ?RELAX provides rich datatypes, and ?RELAX is namespace-aware.The RELAX specification consists of two parts, RELAX Core and RELAX Namespace. This part of the Technical Report gives RELAX Core, which may be used to describe markup languages containing a single XML namespace. Part 2 of this Technical Report gives RELAX Namespace, which may be used to describe markup languages containing more than a single XML namespace, consisting of more than one RELAX Core document.Given a sequence of elements, a software module called the RELAX Core processor compares it against a specification in RELAX Core and reports the result. The RELAX Core processor can be directly invoked by the user, and can also be invoked by another software module called the RELAX Namespace processor.RELAX may be used in conjunction with DTDs. In particular, notations and entities declared by DTDs can be constrained by RELAX.This part of the Technical Report also gives a subset of RELAX Core, which is restricted to DTD features plus datatypes. This subset is very easy to implement, and with the exception of datatype information, conversion between this subset and XML DTDs results in no information loss.
For aspects of quality specific to facial images, ISO/IEC TR 29794-5:2010: ?specifies terms and definitions that are useful in the specification, use and testing of face image quality metrics; ?defines the purpose, intent, and interpretation of face image quality scores.Performance assessment of quality algorithms and standardization of quality algorithms are outside the scope of ISO/IEC TR 29794-5:2010.
ISO/IEC TR 9573-11:2004 defines the document structures and style specifications for standards document interchange (in particular, ISO standards). Element types and attributes for ISO standards are defined and two profiles (a database-oriented profile and a document-oriented profile) are provided.
The document structures are described by
- an SGML (ISO 8879) DTD,
- an XML DTD, and
- a RELAX NG (ISO/IEC 19757-2) schema.
The style specifications are described by
- DSSSL (ISO/IEC 10179),
- XSLT, and
- XSL.
Rendering examples and a list of processing tools are provided for information.
ISO/IEC TS 20071-11:2012 applies to all static images that are used in any type of electronic document. It also applies to individual images within a slide show of electronic images. ISO/IEC TS 20071-11:2012 does not apply to moving images (e.g. movies). The guidance contained in ISO/IEC TS 20071-11:2012 is intended to be used by the person who creates content to be placed in an electronic document. There is no expectation that this person will have any additional expertise beyond understanding the contents of the document and why an image was chosen to be placed within the document. While the main intent of the guidance within ISO/IEC TS 20071-11:2012 is the creation of text alternatives, the information identified in this guidance could be placed in the main document text, reducing the length of the resulting text alternatives. However, placing information in the main document text does not fully replace the function of having some text alternatives for each image.
ISO/IEC TR 24722:2007 provides a description of and analysis of current practice on multimodal and other multibiometric fusion, including (as appropriate) reference to a more detailed description. It also discusses the need for, and possible routes to, standardization to support multibiometric systems.