This classification provides a set of definitions and categories for the certification and licensing of Unmanned Aircraft (UA) pilots. It is designed for use by both industry and regulatory authorities applicable to UA across the entire size, weight and performance continuum, and is guided by the following principles: match existing regulations for manned aircraft to the maximum extent practical; similar words in other standards or regulations shall have similar meaning herein; avoid burdening regulatory agencies and users with an overabundance of new terms and definitions; and anticipate adoption by military and government users, although targeted primarily at commercial and private users.1.1 This classification covers a set of definitions and categorization for the certification and licensing of Unmanned Aircraft (UA) pilots. It is designed for use by both industry and regulatory authorities applicable to UA across the entire size, weight and performance continuum. In creating this classification, contributors were guided by the following principles:1.1.1 Parallel existing regulations for manned aircraft to the maximum extent practical.1.1.2 Similar words in other standards or regulations shall have similar meaning herein (e.g., 14 CFR Part 61 and FAA Notice 07-01, and Australias CASR Part 101).1.1.3 Avoid burdening regulatory agencies and users with an overabundance of new terms and definitions. Where new terms are required, their meanings shall strive to be self-evident.1.1.4 Although targeted primarily at commercial and private users, the standard should anticipate adoption by military and government users.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
This guide for certification of coating conformance form provides procurement information concerning products being furnished in accordance with a specific coating specification and additional requirements contained in the purchase order. The certification form is divided into four headings: General Type and Description(I), Buyer Information(II), Seller Information (III), and Certification (IV). The first heading consists of the following information: generic type, manufacturer's designation, specification number, formula number, component number, component identification, and color. The second heading consists purchase order number, release number, part number, item number, and stock number. The third heading consists of seller's representative, batch number, lot number, date of manufacture, and date of certification expiration. The last heading is a paragraph describing the certification.1.1 This certification of coating conformance form provides procurement information concerning products being furnished in accordance with a specific coating specification and additional requirements contained in the purchase order (see Fig. 1).CERTIFICATION OF COATING CONFORMANCE FORM Number:Date:I. GENERAL TYPE AND DESCRIPTION: Generic Type: Manufacturer's Designation: Specification Number: Formula Number: Number of Components: Component Identification (if applicable): Color:II. BUYER INFORMATION: Name and Address: Purchase Order Number: Release Number (if applicable): Part Number (if applicable): Item Number (if applicable): Stock Number (if applicable):III. SELLER INFORMATION: Name and Address: Seller's Representative: (Include Telephone Number) Batch Number: Lot No.: Date of Manufacture: Date of Expiration of Certification:IV. CERTIFICATION:This is to certify that the above material being furnished has been manufactured in accordance with the specification and meets all specification requirements contained in the above purchase order. NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE DATEFIG. 1 Certification Form1.2 The completed form can be utilized to help evaluate the acceptability of the paint being furnished.
1.1 This guide specifies general requirements for a body to follow if it is to be recognized at a national or international level as competent and reliable in assessing and subsequently accrediting certification bodies or registration bodies. Conformity to the requirements of this guide will promote equivalence of national systems and facilitate agreements on mutual recognition of accreditations between such bodies. 1.2 The primary objective of this guide is to describe accreditation as providing, by means of assessment and subsequent surveillance, an assurance that the market can rely on certificates issued by the acredited bodies. However, organizations other than accreditation bodies, concerned with recognition of competence, also may use it by replacing accreditation by recognition 1.3 In some countries, bodies which verify conformity of products, processes, services, or systems to specified standards are called certification bodies, in other countries registration bodies, and in still others assessment bodies. For ease of understanding, this guide always refers to such bodies as bodies. This should not be understood to be limiting, as this guide also may be applicable to the assessment and acccreditation of conformity assessment bodies other than certification or registration bodies, such as inspection bodies. Note 1--It is recognized that agreements on mutual recognition of accreditations aiming at the removal of barriers to cross-border trade may have to cover other aspects not explicitly specified in these general requirements, such as the exhcange of staff or training programs. In particular, with a view to create confidence and harmonize the interpretation and implementation of standards, each accreditation body should encourage technical cooperation and exchange of experience among bodies accredited by it, and it should be prepared to exchange information or accreditation procedures and practices with other accreditation bodies. Certification and certification/registration body standards often cntain nonspecific requirements, such as "staff shall be competent". Mutual recognition of accreditation requires harmonization of interpretation of such clauses.
1.1 This practice covers minimum acceptable accreditation criteria to assist in the assessment of certification programs for environmental professionals. 1.2 This practice will assist a user of environmental services in identifying credible certification programs for environmental professionals. 1.3 This practice does not propose to address any specific certification program for environmental professionals. It is the responsibility of the user of this guide to determine whether or not a specific certification program meets the criteria contained herein. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
This guide describes the suggested procedures for the preparation, testing, and certification of reference materials (RMs) to be used in the calibration, verification, and control of methods used to characterize the chemical composition of metals, ores, and related materials. Certified reference materials are frequently rare and valuable commodities requiring investment of considerable cost and production time. They are frequently available for only a limited portion of a user’ range of interest. When comparative analytical methods are employed, appropriate CRMs are often unavailable for calibration. In this case, the use of RMs is indicated as the alternative choice. The use of uncertified homogeneous materials is appropriate for control chart programs where relative data consistency is being monitored. The use of CRMs for such purposes is often a misuse of valuable CRM stocks, especially when uncertified materials of suitable homogeneity are available. For information on the use and misuse of CRMs, see ISO Guide 33 and NBS Special Publication 260-100.5 Use CRMs and RMs with caution in the validation of analytical methods. The danger involves a potential for undetected systematic error, since the same methodology being validated may have been used to establish the values for the CRMs or RMs. For more information on the use of CRMs in the validation of analytical methods, see NIST Special Publication 829.6 1.1 This guide describes procedures to be considered for the testing and certification of metal, ore, and metal-related reference materials in the form of blocks, disks, rods, wires, chips, and powders.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
This practice covers basic criteria for the structure and conduct of a certification organization, the development and operation of a certification program, and the development and use of customary mechanisms to evaluate a candidate's knowledge, skill, and ability. The qualifications of the examiner and limitations on the relationship between the examiner and the examinee are given.The basic criteria covered by this practice are intended to be supplemented by more specific criteria serving the requirements of the certification organization.1.1 This practice covers a standard for establishing evaluation and certification procedures for personnel engaged in testing and inspecting bituminous paving materials in accordance with specified test methods and is intended for use by independent organizations providing certification services.Note 1—Refer to Specifications D 3666 for information on the minimum requirements for agencies testing and inspecting bituminous paving materials and to Practice D 4561 for information on quality control systems for organizations producing and applying bituminous paving materials.1.2 Qualification for certification candidates, qualifications of those administering the certification examinations, methods of administering the certification tests, and certain certification organization operating requirements are given.1.3 Competency determination typically includes a monitored written examination and a performance evaluation.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.