【国外标准】 Standard Practice for (Analytical Procedure) Determining the Efficiency of a Production Well in a Confined Aquifer from a Constant Rate Pumping Test
本网站 发布时间:
2024-02-28
开通会员免费在线看70000余条国内标准,赠送文本下载次数,单本最低仅合13.3元!还可享标准出版进度查询、定制跟踪推送、标准查新等超多特权!  
查看详情>>
标准简介
适用范围:
5.1 This practice allows the user to compute the true hydraulic efficiency of a pumped well in a confined aquifer from a constant rate pumping field test. The procedures described constitute the only valid method of determining well efficiency. Some practitioners have confused well efficiency with percentage of head loss associated with laminar flow, a parameter commonly determined from a step-drawdown test. Well efficiency, however, cannot be determined from a step-drawdown test but only can be determined from a constant rate test.5.2 Assumptions: 5.2.1 Control well discharges at a constant rate, Q.5.2.2 Control well is of infinitesimal diameter.5.2.3 Data are obtained from the control well and, if available, a number of observation wells.5.2.4 The aquifer is confined, homogeneous, and extensive. The aquifer may be anisotropic, and if so, the directions of maximum and minimum hydraulic conductivity are horizontal and vertical, respectively.5.2.5 Discharge from the well is derived exclusively from storage in the aquifer.5.3 Calculation Requirements—For the special case of partially penetrating wells, application of this practice may be computationally intensive. The function fs shown in Eq 6 should be evaluated using arbitrary input parameters. It is not practical to use existing, somewhat limited, tables of values for fs and, because this equation is rather formidable, it may not be tractable by hand. Because of this, it is assumed the practitioner using this practice will have available a computerized procedure for evaluating the function fs. This can be accomplished using commercially available mathematical software including some spreadsheet applications. If calculating fs is not practical, it is recommended to substitute the Kozeny equation for the Hantush equation as previously described.NOTE 1: The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspection/etc. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not in itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.NOTE 2: Commercially available software is available for the calculating, graphing, plotting, and analyses of this practice. The user is responsible for verifying the correctness of the formulas, graphs, plots and analyses of the software.1.1 This practice describes an analytical procedure for determining the hydraulic efficiency of a production well in a confined aquifer. It involves comparing the actual drawdown in the well to the theoretical minimum drawdown achievable and is based upon data and aquifer coefficients obtained from a constant rate pumping test.1.2 This analytical practice is used in conjunction with the field procedure, Test Method D4050.1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard, except as noted below. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units, which are provided for information only and are not considered standard. The reporting of results in units other than inch-pound shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard.1.3.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In this system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the unit for mass is slugs.1.4 Limitations—The limitations of the technique for determination of well efficiency are related primarily to the correspondence between the field situation and the simplifying assumption of this practice.1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and round established in Practice D6026, unless superseded by this standard.1.5.1 The procedures used to specify how data are collected/recorded or calculated, in this standard are regarded as the industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that generally should be retained. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported date to be commensurate with these considerations. It is beyond the scope of this standard to consider significant digits used in analysis method for engineering design.1.6 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of the practice may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without the consideration of a project’s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
标准号:
ASTM D6034-20
标准名称:
Standard Practice for (Analytical Procedure) Determining the Efficiency of a Production Well in a Confined Aquifer from a Constant Rate Pumping Test
英文名称:
Standard Practice for (Analytical Procedure) Determining the Efficiency of a Production Well in a Confined Aquifer from a Constant Rate Pumping Test标准状态:
Active-
发布日期:
-
实施日期:
出版语种:
- 推荐标准
- 国家标准计划
- 24/30491443 DC standard
- 24/30489392 DC BS EN IEC 62358 Ferrite cores. Standard inductance factor for gapped cores and its tolerance
- BS ISO 19848:2024 - TC Tracked Changes. Ships and marine technology. Standard data for shipboard machinery and equipment
- BS ISO 19848:2024 Ships and marine technology. Standard data for shipboard machinery and equipment
- BS IEC 61360-7:2024 Standard data element types with associated classification scheme
- 24/30487130 DC BS EN 50566:2017/A2:2024 Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of wireless communication
- 24/30486472 DC - Product standard
- KS M ISO 4259-4 석유 및 관련 제품 — 측정 방법과 결과의 정밀도 — 제4부: 개별 실험실에서 표준 시험방법의 실행에 대한 ‘통계적 관리’ 상태를 확인하기 위한 통계적 관리도의 사용
- KS C IEC 61340-4-6 정전기학 — 제4-6부: 구체적 적용 분야에 대한 표준 시험방법 — 손목접지대
- KS C IEC 61340-4-7 정전기학 — 제4-7부: 구체적 적용 분야에 대한 표준 시험방법 — 이온화
- KS C IEC 61340-4-8 정전기학 — 제4-8부: 구체적 적용 분야에 대한 표준 시험방법 — ESD 차폐성 — 봉투
- 24/30485973 DC standard
- BS EN 14662-1:2023 - TC Tracked Changes. Ambient air quality. Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations
- KS C IEC 61837-2 주파수 제어 및 선택을 위한 표면 실장형 압전 장치 — 표준 아웃라인 및 단자 리드 연결 — 제2부: 세라믹 함체
- BS EN IEC 61753-081-02:2023 Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components. Performance standard